To satisfy a prurient taste the details of sexual relations are spread broadcast in the columns of the daily papers. Gossip is no longer the resource of the idle and of the vicious, but has become a trade, which is pursued with industry as well as effrontery. The press is overstepping in every direction the obvious bounds of propriety and of decency. The piece specifically defines privacy against the invasive powers of the press, the photographer, and gossip: Warren authored a piece in the Harvard Law Review called “The Right to Privacy,” which is the foundation for our contemporary concept of privacy (along with Brandeis’s dissent in Olmstead v. Hogan owes his claim to privacy to former U.S. Early Debates about Privacy and the Press For one thing, he was awarded $55 million to compensate him for the money he would have made had he released the tape (at $5 a download), suggesting that privacy might not be Hogan’s main concern. Hogan’s contention that the press invaded his privacy is certainly up for debate. Of course, the press has always walked the newsworthiness line when it comes to gossip and celebrities. The press has always walked the newsworthiness line when it comes to gossip and celebrities.īut it’s easy to see how this decision could influence journalists in the future censorship is a slippery slope, and as Bertoni notes, Gawker’s lawyer is right to point out that “the First Amendment must take a broad view of ‘newsworthiness’ to have any effect.” And the threat of retribution presented by Hogan’s suit is huge: If media organizations make one wrong move, they could be tanked. It had been floating among news organizations for some time before Gawker decided to publish it, and Gawker editors have since backpedaled a bit from their decision. The Hogan tape is not clearly newsworthy-but it’s not clearly not newsworthy, either. Sex tapes are considered newsworthy if they expose the hypocrisy of a public official or are in some other way relevant to public life. Gawker is appealing the decision.įabio Bertoni, the New Yorker’s general counsel, makes the argument that the decision against Gawker chips away at freedom of the press, largely by threatening editorial discretion about what is newsworthy and producing a chilling effect. Hogan claimed that the tape represented an invasion of his privacy by the press. In 2012, Gawker released a sex tape of Hogan and his friend and radio DJ Bubba Clem’s wife, which was taped by Bubba Clem, allegedly without Hogan’s knowledge. In March, 2016, a jury awarded wrestler Hulk Hogan $140 million in damages from a suit he brought against Gawker Media.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |